Open post

Happy New Year 2026!

As we enter the new year, we see this as the perfect time to plan, foster ideas and relationships while leaning into creativity.

Winter is also a time for reflection and ensuring we can all build on work that has already been undertaken.

2025 was, on the whole, a strong year for the nuclear sector. Public opinion was up, nuclear energy infrastructure was visible on a global scale, and there seems to be renewed interest and support for the future of nuclear power in the UK and beyond.

Below we’ve given brief insight to different areas of the nuclear sector in the UK and globally including defence, engineering, construction and waste management. Please reach out to take these conversations further, to continue networking, and to share your expertise.

Defence

The UK Nuclear Defence sector has seen the modernisation of Trident by continuing its investment in the Dreadnought-class submarines, which will replace the Vanguard fleet as part of the Trident nuclear deterrent program. Construction milestones were met, keeping the program on track for the early 2030s.

AUKUS and Strategic Partnerships saw a deepened collaboration, focusing on nuclear-powered submarine technology and advanced defence capabilities.

Where Policies were concerned the UK reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining a “minimum credible deterrent,” while supporting NATO’s nuclear posture amid heightened global tensions.

On the global stage nuclear defence trends included U.S. and NATO advancing the modernisation of its nuclear triad, including new ICBMs (Sentinel program) and B-21 bombers. NATO emphasised nuclear deterrence as part of its strategic concept.

Russia: Continued development of novel nuclear delivery systems (e.g., hypersonic weapons, Poseidon underwater drones) amid geopolitical strains.

China: Expanded its nuclear arsenal significantly, moving toward a larger and more diversified deterrent, including silo-based ICBMs and submarine-launched systems.

Arms Control Challenges: The collapse of major treaties like New START renewal talks and growing concerns over arms race dynamics marked 2025 as a year of uncertainty for global nuclear governance.

Engineering & Construction

Last year wasn’t just about policy or energy targets; it was a year defined by engineering ambition and construction milestones that will shape the industry for decades to come.

Hinkley Point C continued to dominate headlines as one of the most complex civil engineering projects in Europe. The site saw major progress, from reactor building completion to the installation of critical components. These achievements weren’t without challenges such as cost pressures and supply chain constraints testing resilience, but the project remains central to Britain’s low-carbon energy future.

Meanwhile, Sizewell C moved from planning into tangible action. Preparatory works accelerated, and engineering contracts expanded to support modular construction techniques, signalling a shift toward efficiency and innovation.

But infrastructure isn’t just about concrete and steel, it’s about people. 2025 highlighted the growing need for skilled engineers, project managers, and technical specialists. Apprenticeships and nuclear-specific training programs gained momentum, ensuring the next generation is ready to deliver on these ambitious projects, yet mid-career to executive level we certainly have an important skills gap to address.

Globally, the story was just as compelling. In the United States, Vogtle Units 3 and 4 marked a historic milestone as the first new reactors in decades entered operation. These projects showcased advanced modular assembly techniques, setting a precedent for future builds.

Across Asia, China continued its rapid expansion, leveraging standardised designs to deploy multiple reactors simultaneously, a feat that underscores the importance of engineering precision and scalability.

India and South Korea also pushed forward with new projects, reinforcing nuclear’s role in energy security.

Innovation was another defining theme. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) moved from concept to reality, with pilot projects in Canada, the US, and the UK edging closer to licensing and early-stage construction. These designs promise flexibility, faster deployment, and a new era of nuclear engineering that could transform how we think about energy infrastructure.

Waste Management

When we talk about nuclear energy, the conversation often gravitates toward power generation, innovation, and carbon reduction. But behind every reactor and infrastructure project lies a critical responsibility, managing nuclear waste safely and sustainably. In 2025, this area saw significant progress and some pressing challenges that will define the future of the industry.

Across the UK, the focus remained on advancing the Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) program, a cornerstone of long-term waste strategy. Community engagement deepened, with several regions actively participating in site evaluations. This wasn’t just about engineering; it was about building trust and transparency. The year highlighted how technical excellence and social responsibility must go hand in hand when dealing with high-level waste.

Operationally, the UK continued to make strides in interim storage solutions, ensuring that spent fuel and radioactive materials are managed securely while permanent disposal options evolve. Engineering innovation played a key role here, with improved containment systems and digital monitoring technologies enhancing safety standards.

Globally, the narrative was equally dynamic. Finland’s Onkalo repository moved closer to becoming the world’s first operational deep geological facility, a milestone that sets a precedent for others. Sweden and France advanced their own disposal programs, while the United States renewed efforts to resolve long-standing challenges around permanent storage. Meanwhile, countries like Canada and Japan invested heavily in research on advanced waste treatment and recycling technologies, aiming to reduce volumes and recover valuable materials.

One of the most exciting developments was the growing interest in partitioning and transmutation techniques that could dramatically reduce the long-term radiotoxicity of waste. While still in the research phase, these innovations signal a future where waste management is not just about containment but transformation.

For professionals in the nuclear sector, these trends underscore a vital truth, waste management is no longer a back-office function. It’s a front-line discipline requiring expertise in engineering, environmental science, policy, and stakeholder engagement. Careers in this space are expanding, offering opportunities to shape solutions that will safeguard generations to come.

In Conclusion

As we move into 2026, the challenge is clear, how do we accelerate progress while maintaining public confidence and technical rigor? The answer lies in collaboration between governments, industry, and communities, and in the talent that drives innovation forward. If 2025 was a year of groundwork, 2026 must be a year of action.

Remember to contact us to expand on these topics and to discuss how Nuclear Careers can help with your hiring needs in 2026.

Open post

Eskom Charts a Bold Course for South Africa’s Next Nuclear Era

With environmental assessments underway for a third nuclear power station, the utility faces a delicate balance between energy security and ecological stewardship.

Eskom is poised to steer South Africa into a new chapter of its nuclear journey, having officially launched the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for a prospective third nuclear power station.

Building on the momentum of its second plant at Duynefontein, which received final environmental clearance just four months ago, Eskom is now considering two coastal sites: Thyspunt in the Eastern Cape and Bantamsklip near Dyer Island in the Overberg region. This facility is envisioned to deliver a commanding 5,200 MW of capacity, signalling a bold leap in the nation’s energy strategy.

To guide this pivotal decision, Eskom appointed WSP Group Africa as the independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP). A virtual pre-application meeting outlined the “exceptionally tight” approval schedule mandated by national regulations. The primary goal is to achieve environmental authorisation from the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) by February 2027, with potential appeals resolved by May 2027.

Beyond environmental scrutiny, Eskom will also pursue heritage clearance, water-use licencing, coastal discharge permits, and a site license from the National Nuclear Regulator.

While Thyspunt and Bantamsklip were both previously shortlisted for South Africa’s second nuclear site, ultimately awarded to Duynefontein, the new assessment has resurrected old debates around ecological, social, and heritage concerns.

Bantamsklip, positioned near an internationally important marine ecosystem hosting roughly 1,000 breeding pairs of critically endangered African penguins, southern right whales, Cape fur seals, sharks, dolphins, and abalone, has attracted intense scrutiny. Conservationists are deeply concerned about sediment upheaval, underwater noise, chemical effluents, and potential thermal impacts on marine habitats. There is also alarm over sand disposal and the threat it poses to kelp forests, which underpin local fisheries and tourism.

Amid these ecological fears, Dyer Island Conservation Trust and Thyspunt Alliance have pledged renewed advocacy and legal resistance, recalling previous project delays on similar grounds.

Eskom, for its part, insists the new EIA will integrate lessons from prior processes and apply a comprehensive, “technology envelope” to accommodate unknown reactor types, aiming to balance thorough baseline studies, ranging from seismic and hydrological assessments to marine biology, with innovative energy planning.

At this stage, discussions remain conceptual: no reactor technologies have been finalised, nor have financing or ownership structures been detailed. Yet the ambition is clear.

Embedded in the broader Integrated Resource Plan 2025, which targets 105 GW of new generation capacity by 2039, this nuclear initiative forms a cornerstone of Eskom’s Nuclear Industrial Plan, designed to re-anchor national nuclear expertise and enhance energy security.

As South Africa balances its pressing energy needs with ecological responsibility, the next 18 months of regulatory review, public input, and environmental due diligence will shape both the outcome and global leadership signal this project embodies.

Picture: Eskom

Open post

Virtual Power Plants & Sustainable Energy Systems

Virtual Power Plants (VPP’s) are digital platforms that aggregate multiple distributed resources including solar panels, battery storage, commercial/industrial/residential demands and funnel them into a single, coordinated network that operates like a traditional power plant.

There are many benefits to VPP’s and we’ve listed some below.

Cost-Effectiveness: More economical than traditional peaker plants as they can provide energy at a lower cost during peak times.

Grid Stability: They help balance supply and demand which reduces outages and also maintains voltage levels on the grid.

Consumer Incentives: Businesses and households who participate in VPP programmes often get financial benefits such as bill credits or direct payments for utilising their energy resources.

Environmental Impact: VPP’s utilise renewable energy resources and in turn they contribute towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable practices.

Picture: solarreviews.com

Scroll to top